Blog Layout

Corporate Transparency Act Creates Filing Requirements for Most Businesses in 2024

Greg Dowell • Nov 13, 2023

Catching many businesses by surprise, this Act kicks in with filing requirements as early as January 1, 2024.

Protecting privacy of the underlying business owners has been a key tenet of the incorporation and organizational laws of many states.  Regardless of the valid desires in many cases to provide that privacy protection, Congress determined that disclosure of entity ownership is required - despite the laws of individual states. 


Out of concerns about foreign terrorists and money laundering going undetected, The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) was created by Congress to require that businesses disclose who are the underlying owners.  It is also believed that this information will assist in tax investigations and potential cases of tax evasion.  The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network ("FinCEN") of United States Treasury Department has been charged with enforcing the CTA.  Most businesses will be required to file a statement with FinCEN that provides beneficial ownership information (BOI) of the business.  Businesses will need to disclose the owner's full name, home address, date of birth, driver's license number or passport number, as well as a copy of the driver's license or passport.  This information will be collected and stored in a data warehouse that will be shared with law enforcement, the IRS, and other federal and state departments.  The filing requirements begin as early as January 1, 2024. 


The CTA requires that "reporting companies" file initial reports and then subsequent updates when there is a change in beneficial ownership.  What gives many observers pause is the broad definition of a reporting company.  A reporting company is a domestic corporation, limited liability company, or any other entity that is created by the filing of a document with a secretary of state or any similar office under the law of a State or Indian tribe.  Not to be limited by domestic entities, the definition broadens to include a corporation, limited liability company, or other entity that is formed under the law of a foreign country, that registers to do business by the filing of a document with a secretary of state or any similar office under the law of a State or Indian tribe.


There are some very specific exemptions from the reporting requirements, which generally are businesses that are already required to register with the US government.  These include the following:

  • Securities reporting issuers
  • Governmental authorities
  • Banks
  • Credit unions
  • Depository institution holding companies
  • Money services businesses
  • Securities brokers or dealers
  • Security exchanges; other exchanges registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  • Investment companies
  • Venture capital fund advisers
  • Insurance companies
  • State-licensed insurance producers
  • Entitles registered under the Commodity Exchange Act
  • Public accounting firms
  • Public utility companies
  • Financial market utilities
  • Pooled investment vehicles
  • Tax-exempt entities or entities assisting a tax-exempt entity
  • Subsidiaries of certain exempt entities
  • Inactive entities
  • Large operating entities


The last exemption noted above, "large operating entities", is defined as a company that employs 20 or more full-time employees (who work on average at least 30 hours per week), have an operating presence at a physical office within the United States, and filed a federal income tax or information return in the United States for the previous year reporting more than $5,000,000 in gross receipts or sales.  Clearly, this is a very broadly-cast net that captures most small and family-owned businesses in the US that have less than $5,000,000 in revenue.


Businesses (the reporting company) subject to the CTA must disclose their beneficial owners.  Beneficial owners are individuals who, directly or indirectly, either exercise "substantial control" over the reporting company or own or control at least 25% of the ownership interests of the reporting company.  Ownership interest includes traditional stock, partner or member capital, and profits interest.  It also includes other forms of capital products like warrants, options, and convertible notes that are used to establish ownership.  The CTA also indicates that control can come through contracts, joint ownership, or control through intermediate entities.  Substantial control is present if the individual is a "senior officer" or is "exercising the authority of a president, chief financial officer, general counsel, chief executive officer, chief operating officer, or any other officer, regardless of official title."


Entities (reporting companies) that were created prior to January 1, 2024 will have one year to file the initial reports. Entities that were created on or after January 1, 2024 will have only 30 days to file, measured from the earlier of its receipt of actual notice of the entity's creation or the secretary of state's provision of public notice of the entity's existence. Both older and newer entities will also have 30 days to provide updated reports when any beneficial ownership information changes. Further, a "willful" failure to file an initial report, providing incorrect information, or failing to update the report may result in civil and/or criminal penalties.


It may take them some time to update their internal processes and software, but it should be assumed that the IRS and State governments will take advantage of this treasure trove of information to expand their audit capabilities and effectiveness.  At the Federal level, it should become more difficult for an individual to omit reporting a K-1 from a partnership on their individual tax return.  States will have another powerful tool to track down any beneficial owner who uses their state as a home address. 


While the Corporate Transparency Act undoubtedly will give the taxing authorities and law enforcement new tools to fight fraud and crime, the cost of compliance (and noncompliance) and overall burden on small businesses is enormous.  It can be assumed that most bad actors will not report their beneficial ownership interests under this law, which means that those left complying with the CTA are largely going to be law-abiding taxpayers.  On top of that, an incredible amount of sensitive data is all gathered in one place, under the watchful eye of the government - what could possibly go wrong?

14 Dec, 2023
With year-end approaching, it is time to start thinking about moves that may help lower your tax bill for this year and next. This year’s planning is more challenging than usual due to changes made by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and the SECURE 2.0 Act.
14 Dec, 2023
With year-end approaching, it is time to start thinking about moves that may help lower your business's taxes for this year and next.
By Greg Dowell 14 Nov, 2023
How to make doing good a little less frightening financially.
By Greg Dowell 05 Sep, 2023
Having a business fail for lack of employees was unheard of 10 years ago. The problem existed for many businesses long before the pandemic, but it certainly went to a whole new level from 2020 to the present.
By Greg Dowell 24 Aug, 2023
Improve profitability, reduce the opportunity for fraud, focus on your core business, eliminate excuses for tardy financial data - what's not to love about outsourcing your accounting?
By Greg Dowell 16 Aug, 2023
ESOPs have been around for years; they could be a solution for ownership transition.
By Greg Dowell 16 May, 2023
by Gregory S. Dowell Updated May 16, 2023 Spring is the traditional kick-off to wedding season, and thoughts quickly turn to the wedding venue, gifts, the happy couple, and, of course, the guest list. Lurking somewhere in the shadows, behind even that strange uncle you barely know, is another guest that needs to be considered: The tax impact on the newlyweds. To start, newlyweds will have two options for filing their income taxes in the year of marriage: Filing status can either be married filing jointly, or married filing separately. In the vast majority of cases, a couple will benefit with a lower overall tax burden to the couple by choosing to file married filing jointly. One of the classic cases where a couple may consider filing separately is when one spouse has significant amounts of medical expenses for the year. Medical expenses are only deductible if they exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income; using only one spouse's income may allow a deduction to be taken if filing separately, compared to losing the medical deduction entirely if both incomes are combined by filing jointly. We previously had written about the tax trap that often occurs when two people get married, resulting often in an unanticipated balance due when the first joint tax return for the couple was filed. While President Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), changed the dynamics somewhat, it is still worthwhile to put pen to paper before saying “I do”. Prospective spouses have the opportunity to save money by taking income tax considerations into account before tying the knot. That’s particularly true for those who plan to marry late this year or early next year. As this article explains, from the federal income tax standpoint, some individuals marrying next year may come out ahead by either deferring or accelerating income, depending on their circumstances. Others may find it to their advantage to defer a year-end marriage until next year. For some quick background, a “marriage penalty” exists whenever the tax on a couple’s joint return is more than the combined taxes each spouse would pay if they weren’t married and each filed a single or head of household income tax return. Before President Trump’s TCJA, only the 10% and 15% married filing jointly brackets were set at twice that of the singles bracket, and so the marriage penalty effect on joint filers applied in the brackets above the 15% bracket. Beginning with the 2018 tax year, however, the TCJA set the statutory tax brackets for marrieds filing jointly-through the 32% bracket-at twice the amount of the corresponding tax brackets for singles. As a result, the TCJA eliminated any tax-bracket-generated marriage penalty effect for joint filers where each spouse has roughly the same amount of taxable income-through the 32% bracket. For example, if two individuals who each have $215,950 of taxable income file as single taxpayers for 2022, each would have a tax bill of $49,335.50, for a combined total of $98,671. If they were married, their tax bill as marrieds filing jointly would be $98,671, exactly the same amount as the combined total tax they’d pay as single taxpayers. Because the 35% bracket for marrieds filing jointly isn’t twice the amount of the singles 35% bracket, the marriage penalty effect will still apply to joint filers whose income falls in the 35% bracket. Using 2022 tax tables, two single taxpayers may each have $500,000 in taxable income, for a combined total of $1,000,000, without having any of it taxed higher than 35%. However, for marrieds filing jointly, the 35% tax bracket ends at $647,850 in taxable income, and each additional dollar of taxable income taxed at 37%. Thus, where two high-earning unmarried taxpayers with substantially equal amounts of taxable income are planning for their marriage to take place either late this year or early next, it may pay from the tax viewpoint to defer the marriage until next year. As an example, if two individuals each have $539,900 of taxable income file as single taxpayers for 2023, each would have a tax bill of $162,718, for a combined total of $325,436. If they were married before the end of the year, their tax bill as marrieds filing jointly would be $334,076, or $8,640 more than the combined total tax they’d pay as single taxpayers. If only one of the prospective spouses has substantial income, marriage and the filing of a joint return may save taxes, thus resulting in a marriage bonus. The bonus is the result of two factors: 1) the tax brackets for marrieds filing jointly cover wider spans of income than the tax brackets for taxpayers as singles; and 2) the taxable income of the lower-earning individual may not push the couple’s combined income into a higher tax bracket. In such a case, it will probably be better from the tax standpoint to accelerate the marriage into this year if feasible. There are a number of other factors that should also be taken into account when determining the effect of a marriage on income taxes of the couple. As mentioned early in this post, the first decision is to verify that filing a joint return is preferred to filing separate returns. In addition, many provisions of the tax code phase out completely (or decrease partially) as adjusted gross income increases. In a perfect world, there would only be good surprises for a newlywed couple following their wedding. To avoid any unpleasant income tax surprises, we always recommend that a newlywed couple take the time to make a projection of what their income will look like when combined as a couple, and determine what the tax bill will look like, at the Federal and State levels. After all, planning ahead, communicating with each other, discussing finances, and avoiding unpleasant surprises are some of the keys to a long marriage.
By Greg Dowell 11 Mar, 2023
Don't forget a birthday, anniversary, or any of these tax filing dates . . .
By Greg Dowell 07 Feb, 2023
The IRS asks taxpayers to wait to file 1040s if they received rebate payments from their state in 2022.
By Greg Dowell 04 Jan, 2023
Corporate Jet - What's the right choice for your business?
More Posts
Share by: