Blog Layout

Coronavirus Relief and Nonprofits

Apr 14, 2002

by Gregory S. Dowell

April 14, 2020


Nonprofit organizations have been treated oddly in most of the COVID-19 relief measures that we’ve seen thus far. While some (not all) nonprofits have been included in various ways, the treatment has been uneven and even a bit perplexing. Here is how we analyze the major relief packages for nonprofits:



  • Paycheck Protection Program Loan – 501(c)(3) organizations are included in probably the most talked-about measure, the Paycheck Protection Program Loan. Not all nonprofits are included – for instance, 501(c)(6) organizations are excluded. Faith-based organizations and houses of worship are included. The PPPL allows nonprofits (like businesses) to qualify for a very low interest rate loan that is 2.5 times their average monthly payroll, plus certain add-ons, like payroll taxes and benefits. The most enticing part of the PPPL is that a portion of that loan – the amount spent on qualifying expenditures in the immediate 8 weeks following funding – is forgivable debt, functioning just like a government grant. Unfortunately, many small nonprofits don’t have significant payroll – many rely on volunteers or paying their staffs at very low rates. The lack of payroll limits the dollar amount of this loan, as well as the forgivable feature.
  • Economic Injury Disaster Loan – the EIDL may be one of the better resources for a broad range of nonprofits. It is primarily an opportunity for a low interest loan, however, as the forgivable “grant” feature is limited to $10,000. The loans are available for up to $2 million. While payroll is still a key component in determining the loan amount, it appears that the loan provisions are broader and include other costs incurred due to the disruption. Unlike the PPPL, the loans are based on a credit score and more traditional underwriting. The first $200,000 borrowed does not require a personal guarantee or collateral (unlike the PPPL, which has no personal guarantee or collateral requirements). The interest rate on the loan is 2.75% for nonprofits. Just like the PPPL, a nonprofit must have 500 or fewer employees – not an issue, typically, for small nonprofits. Just like the PPPL, faith-based organizations and houses of worship are eligible.
  • Employee Retention Credit – The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service have launched the Employee Retention Credit, designed to encourage businesses to keep employees on their payroll during the coronavirus crisis. The refundable tax credit is 50% of up to $10,000 in wages paid by an eligible employer whose business has been financially impacted by COVID-19. The credit is available to all employers regardless of size, including tax-exempt organizations, but the credit is not available to state and local governments. Also excluded are small businesses that take small business loans. Qualifying employers must fall into one of two categories: (1) the employer’s business is fully or partially suspended by government order due to COVID-19 during the calendar quarter; and (2) the employer’s gross receipts are below 50% of the comparable quarter in 2019. Once the employer’s gross receipts go above 80% of a comparable quarter in 2019, they no longer qualify after the end of that quarter. The credit, calculated quarterly, is 50% of qualifying wages paid, up to $10,000 in total. Wages paid after March 12, 2020, and before Jan. 1, 2021, are eligible for the credit. Wages are not limited to cash payments, but also include a portion of the cost of employer provided health care. Qualifying wages are based on the average number of a business’s employees in 2019. For employers with 100 or fewer employees, the credit is based on wages paid to all employees, regardless if they worked or not. If the employees worked full time and were paid for full time work, the employer still receives the credit. For employers with more than 100 employees, the credit is allowed only for wages paid to employees who did not work during the calendar quarter. Employers can be immediately reimbursed for the credit by reducing their required deposits of payroll taxes that have been withheld from employees’ wages by the amount of the credit. Eligible employers will report their total qualified wages and the related health insurance costs for each quarter, on their quarterly employment tax returns or Form 941 beginning with the second quarter. If the employer’s employment tax deposits are not sufficient to cover the credit, the employer may receive an advance payment from the IRS by submitting Form 7200, Advance Payment of Employer Credits Due to COVID-19.
14 Dec, 2023
With year-end approaching, it is time to start thinking about moves that may help lower your tax bill for this year and next. This year’s planning is more challenging than usual due to changes made by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and the SECURE 2.0 Act.
14 Dec, 2023
With year-end approaching, it is time to start thinking about moves that may help lower your business's taxes for this year and next.
By Greg Dowell 14 Nov, 2023
How to make doing good a little less frightening financially.
By Greg Dowell 13 Nov, 2023
Catching many businesses by surprise, this Act kicks in with filing requirements as early as January 1, 2024.
By Greg Dowell 05 Sep, 2023
Having a business fail for lack of employees was unheard of 10 years ago. The problem existed for many businesses long before the pandemic, but it certainly went to a whole new level from 2020 to the present.
By Greg Dowell 24 Aug, 2023
Improve profitability, reduce the opportunity for fraud, focus on your core business, eliminate excuses for tardy financial data - what's not to love about outsourcing your accounting?
By Greg Dowell 16 Aug, 2023
ESOPs have been around for years; they could be a solution for ownership transition.
By Greg Dowell 16 May, 2023
by Gregory S. Dowell Updated May 16, 2023 Spring is the traditional kick-off to wedding season, and thoughts quickly turn to the wedding venue, gifts, the happy couple, and, of course, the guest list. Lurking somewhere in the shadows, behind even that strange uncle you barely know, is another guest that needs to be considered: The tax impact on the newlyweds. To start, newlyweds will have two options for filing their income taxes in the year of marriage: Filing status can either be married filing jointly, or married filing separately. In the vast majority of cases, a couple will benefit with a lower overall tax burden to the couple by choosing to file married filing jointly. One of the classic cases where a couple may consider filing separately is when one spouse has significant amounts of medical expenses for the year. Medical expenses are only deductible if they exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income; using only one spouse's income may allow a deduction to be taken if filing separately, compared to losing the medical deduction entirely if both incomes are combined by filing jointly. We previously had written about the tax trap that often occurs when two people get married, resulting often in an unanticipated balance due when the first joint tax return for the couple was filed. While President Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), changed the dynamics somewhat, it is still worthwhile to put pen to paper before saying “I do”. Prospective spouses have the opportunity to save money by taking income tax considerations into account before tying the knot. That’s particularly true for those who plan to marry late this year or early next year. As this article explains, from the federal income tax standpoint, some individuals marrying next year may come out ahead by either deferring or accelerating income, depending on their circumstances. Others may find it to their advantage to defer a year-end marriage until next year. For some quick background, a “marriage penalty” exists whenever the tax on a couple’s joint return is more than the combined taxes each spouse would pay if they weren’t married and each filed a single or head of household income tax return. Before President Trump’s TCJA, only the 10% and 15% married filing jointly brackets were set at twice that of the singles bracket, and so the marriage penalty effect on joint filers applied in the brackets above the 15% bracket. Beginning with the 2018 tax year, however, the TCJA set the statutory tax brackets for marrieds filing jointly-through the 32% bracket-at twice the amount of the corresponding tax brackets for singles. As a result, the TCJA eliminated any tax-bracket-generated marriage penalty effect for joint filers where each spouse has roughly the same amount of taxable income-through the 32% bracket. For example, if two individuals who each have $215,950 of taxable income file as single taxpayers for 2022, each would have a tax bill of $49,335.50, for a combined total of $98,671. If they were married, their tax bill as marrieds filing jointly would be $98,671, exactly the same amount as the combined total tax they’d pay as single taxpayers. Because the 35% bracket for marrieds filing jointly isn’t twice the amount of the singles 35% bracket, the marriage penalty effect will still apply to joint filers whose income falls in the 35% bracket. Using 2022 tax tables, two single taxpayers may each have $500,000 in taxable income, for a combined total of $1,000,000, without having any of it taxed higher than 35%. However, for marrieds filing jointly, the 35% tax bracket ends at $647,850 in taxable income, and each additional dollar of taxable income taxed at 37%. Thus, where two high-earning unmarried taxpayers with substantially equal amounts of taxable income are planning for their marriage to take place either late this year or early next, it may pay from the tax viewpoint to defer the marriage until next year. As an example, if two individuals each have $539,900 of taxable income file as single taxpayers for 2023, each would have a tax bill of $162,718, for a combined total of $325,436. If they were married before the end of the year, their tax bill as marrieds filing jointly would be $334,076, or $8,640 more than the combined total tax they’d pay as single taxpayers. If only one of the prospective spouses has substantial income, marriage and the filing of a joint return may save taxes, thus resulting in a marriage bonus. The bonus is the result of two factors: 1) the tax brackets for marrieds filing jointly cover wider spans of income than the tax brackets for taxpayers as singles; and 2) the taxable income of the lower-earning individual may not push the couple’s combined income into a higher tax bracket. In such a case, it will probably be better from the tax standpoint to accelerate the marriage into this year if feasible. There are a number of other factors that should also be taken into account when determining the effect of a marriage on income taxes of the couple. As mentioned early in this post, the first decision is to verify that filing a joint return is preferred to filing separate returns. In addition, many provisions of the tax code phase out completely (or decrease partially) as adjusted gross income increases. In a perfect world, there would only be good surprises for a newlywed couple following their wedding. To avoid any unpleasant income tax surprises, we always recommend that a newlywed couple take the time to make a projection of what their income will look like when combined as a couple, and determine what the tax bill will look like, at the Federal and State levels. After all, planning ahead, communicating with each other, discussing finances, and avoiding unpleasant surprises are some of the keys to a long marriage.
By Greg Dowell 11 Mar, 2023
Don't forget a birthday, anniversary, or any of these tax filing dates . . .
By Greg Dowell 07 Feb, 2023
The IRS asks taxpayers to wait to file 1040s if they received rebate payments from their state in 2022.
More Posts
Share by: