Foreign Accounts: Take the FBAR Requirements Seriously

June 25, 2019

By Gregory S. Dowell

June 25, 2019

When taxpayers have foreign assets (bank and brokerage accounts, real estate, collectibles), they are required to file foreign financial reporting forms on an annual basis. Filing is required when the value of the assets is equal to or greater than $10,000 at any time during the year. The filing is made on form FinCEN 114, which is more commonly referred to as the FBAR form. The filing requirements have existed for several years now, and there are significant penalties for failing to file the form. The penalty for failure to timely file an FBAR varies according to the level of the taxpayer’s culpability. A willful violation can result in a civil penalty of up to 50% of the balance of each foreign account or $100,000, whichever is greater. A claim by the Government to collect civil penalties for a willful violation consists of seven elements: (1) the defendant was a U.S. citizen at the time of the filing; (2) the defendant had a financial interest in or signatory authority over the account at issue; (3) the account balance exceeded $10,000; (4) the account was in a foreign country; (5) the defendant failed to disclose the account; (6) the failure was willful; and (7) the amount of the proposed penalty is proper. In the past, when these filing requirements were newer and were being emphasized, the IRS has been very willing to accept late-filed FBAR returns in many circumstances, as a way to gain voluntary compliance.


Taxpayers, however, would be wise to heed the findings of the US District court that held that a US citizen willfully failed to file FBARs regarding his Swiss bank accounts. In a recent case, the court found that the taxpayer’s testimony was not credible; he was financially sophisticated and had created financial structures to evade taxes.


Some background: Edward Flume was a US citizen and an experienced businessman who lived and worked in Mexico. As his foreign holdings grew, Flume used a Mexican tax preparation firm, and incorporated his business in the Bahamas initially, and then reincorporated it in Belize. Flume also opened a Swiss account under the corporation’s name with UBS in 2005; only his wife and he had signature authority and they held all of the stock. Flume signed a waiver of a right to invest in US securities, which the IRS later said was evidence that they wanted to hide the activity from US authorities. Flume failed to report his interest in the foreign UBS account to the IRS in 2007 and 2008, in accordance with the FBAR filing requirements, although he did report the interest income on a Mexican bank account. Separately, UBS was under investigation by the IRS on a charge of a broad tax-evasion scheme it was conducting for its US clients. Upon learning of the investigation by the IRS into UBS, Flume moved his account, first to another Mexican bank account, and then back to the US. Finally, in 2010 UBS agreed to comply with the IRS and released the names of its American clients, including Flume.



In June of 2010, Flume filed the delinquent FBAR tax returns for 2006 through 2009, although the value of the accounts he reported were significantly understated. Even though he was eligible, Flume did not apply to the IRS’s Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (OVDI), which might have reduced his liability if he had disclosed the Swiss bank account. In 2014, the IRS determined that Flume had made a willful attempt to avoid US taxes and assessed penalties in excess of $450,000.  Flume claimed the failures were inadvertent, as he had no knowledge of the FBAR requirement until 2010.


The District Court concluded that Flume’s 2007 and 2008 FBAR filing failures were willful, noting the following reasons:

  • Flume’s testimony was not credible and contained numerous contradictions.
  • Flume changed his account of when and how he first learned of the FBAR reporting requirement at least twice.
  • Flume’s account of the discrepancies between his delinquent FBARs and the actual balance of his UBS account strained credulity.
  • Particularly when viewed in light of his disingenuous testimony, Flume’s financial structure reflected a sophisticated tax-evasion scheme.
  • Flume’s testimony about the 2001 transfer of Wilshire Holdings, Inc. from the Bahamas to Belize further demonstrated his familiarity with international tax laws.
  • Flume’s tax preparer’s testimony that Flume was sent an annual reminder of the foreign-account reporting requirements was credible.
  • The fact that Flume disclosed his Mexican account on Schedule B of his tax returns suggests that he was aware of the foreign-account reporting requirement and made a conscious choice not to disclose his Swiss account.
  • Together, UBS’s client-contact records and Flume’s trial testimony establish that Flume was aware of the IRS investigation into UBS by mid-2008. However, Flume did not file any FBARs until after UBS agreed to turn over its American clients’ records to the IRS. This timing strongly suggested that Flume knew he was breaking the law but continued to believe he could get away with it until it became clear that U.S. authorities would learn of his Swiss account.
  • Even if the Court accepted Flume’s claim that he did not know about the FBAR requirement until 2010, his testimony at trial clearly established that he acted with extreme recklessness by failing to review his tax returns before signing them.
By Greg Dowell July 10, 2025
How the Tax Act impacts businesses
By Greg Dowell July 10, 2025
Key information for individuals
By Greg Dowell March 17, 2025
The annual list of tax scams was recently released by the IRS, see article below.
By Greg Dowell March 17, 2025
Rates remain unchanged for 2nd quarter 2025
By Greg Dowell January 24, 2025
To those of us NOT in government, we ask why did this take so long?
By Greg Dowell January 24, 2025
How much impact will Trump's executive order have on the IRS.
By Greg Dowell January 23, 2025
Improve profitability, reduce the opportunity for fraud, focus on your core business, eliminate excuses for tardy financial data - what's not to love about outsourcing your accounting?
By Greg Dowell January 17, 2025
Maybe it's an inheritance, a bonus at work, or some other cash windfall - the question is when and how is the best way to invest?
By Greg Dowell January 16, 2025
Baby, it's cold outside - let's talk financial matters and investments!
By Greg Dowell December 31, 2024
As you may be aware, you can't keep retirement funds in your account indefinitely. You generally have to start taking withdrawals from your IRA, SIMPLE IRA, SEP IRA, or 401(k) plan when you reach age 73. Roth IRAs do not require withdrawals until after the death of the owner. Your required minimum distribution (RMD) is the minimum amount you must withdraw from your account each year. You can withdraw more than the minimum required amount. Your withdrawals will be included in your taxable income except for any part that was taxed before (your basis) or that can be received tax-free (such as qualified distributions from designated Roth accounts). We typically instruct our clients to turn to their investment advisors to determine if they are required to take an RMD and to calculate the amount of the RMD for the year. Most investment advisors and plan custodians will provide those services free of charge, and will also send reminders to their clients each year to take the RMD before the deadlines. That said, it is still good to have a general understanding of the RMD rules. The RMD rules are complicated, so we have put together the following summary that we hope you will find helpful: When do I take my first RMD (the required beginning date)? For an IRA, you must take your first RMD by April 1 of the year following the year in which you turn 73, regardless of whether you're still employed. For a 401(k) plan, you must take your first RMD by April 1 of the year following the later of the year you turn 73, or the year you retire (if allowed by your plan). If you are a 5% owner, you must start RMDs by April 1 of the year following the year you turn 73. What is the deadline for taking subsequent RMDs after the first RMD? After the first RMD, you must take subsequent RMDs by December 31 of each year beginning with the calendar year containing your required beginning date. How do I calculate my RMD? The RMD for any year is the account balance as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar year divided by a distribution period from the IRS's "Uniform Lifetime Table." A separate table is used if the sole beneficiary is the owner's spouse who is ten or more years younger than the owner. How should I take my RMDs if I have multiple accounts? If you have more than one IRA, you must calculate the RMD for each IRA separately each year. However, you may aggregate your RMD amounts for all of your IRAs and withdraw the total from one IRA or a portion from each of your IRAs. You do not have to take a separate RMD from each IRA. If you have more than one 401(k) plan, you must calculate and satisfy your RMDs separately for each plan and withdraw that amount from that plan. May I withdraw more than the RMD? Yes, you can always withdraw more than the RMD, but you can't apply excess withdrawals toward future years' RMDs. May I take more than one withdrawal in a year to meet my RMD? You may withdraw your annual RMD in any number of distributions throughout the year, as long as you withdraw the total annual minimum amount by December 31 (or April 1 if it is for your first RMD). May I satisfy my RMD obligation by making qualified charitable distributions? You may satisfy your RMD obligation by having the trustee make qualified charitable distribution of up to $108,000 in 2025 ($105,000 in 2024) to a public charity (some public charities excepted). The amount of the qualified charitable distribution will not be included in your income. You may also make a one-time election to make qualified charitable distributions to certain charitable trusts or a charitable gift annuity. What happens if I don't take the RMD? If the distributions to you in any year are less than the RMD for that year, you are subject to an additional tax equal to 25% of the undistributed RMD (reduced to 10% if corrected during a specified time frame).
More Posts