IRS Prevails in Cost Segregation

March 13, 2012

By James G. Dowell


The IRS under the Cost Segregation Audit Techniques Guide addresses cost segregation in the following:


In recent years, increasing numbers of taxpayers have submitted either original tax returns or claims for refund with depreciation deductions based on cost segregation studies. The underlying incentive for preparing these studies for federal income tax purposes is the significant tax benefits derived from utilizing shorter recovery periods and accelerated depreciation methods for computing depreciation deductions. The issues for Service examiners are the rationale used to segregate property into its various components, and the methods used to allocate the total project costs among these components.


The benefits of cost segregation can be substantial for taxpayers; however, the Tax Court decision in AmeriSouth XXXII, Ltd. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue has determined a new standard for eligibility. In 2003 one of the AmeriSouth Texas partnerships, AmeriSouth XXXII, Ltd., purchased an apartment complex for $10.25 million. Immediately after making the purchase AmeriSouth began a $2 million dollar renovation of the existing apartment buildings. AmeriSouth, trying to take advantage of accelerated depreciation methods, hired MS Consultants to do a cost segregation study. In all AmeriSouth separated the asset components into 12 categories, attempting to depreciate more than 1,000 building components over five or 15 year spans. AmeriSouth’s accelerated depreciation method generated hundreds of thousands of dollars in tax deductions. The Commissioner argued that the apartment complex should be classified as one asset and therefore must be depreciated over 27.5 years, a timeframe established under the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS). Because of this discrepancy the IRS audited AmeriSouth, denying over $1 million in deductions from 2003 to 2005, leading to the previously mentioned case in the Tax Court.


Complicating the situation further, at the time the case came to trial AmeriSouth sold the apartment complex and stopped all communication with the IRS, the court, and even their attorneys. The court therefore found “any factual matters not contested to be conceded by AmeriSouth.” Looking closer at the 12 categories AmeriSouth had identified for accelerated depreciation, the court sided with the Commissioner in all but a couple of components. They determined that most of the components were structural components, integral to the building’s operation and maintenance, and must be depreciated over the full 27.5 years. The court based its findings off the definition established for “structural component” of a building and determined that for an asset to be a structural component, it must be essential to the operation or maintenance of a typical apartment building. By defining the building as an “apartment” building much of the classified assets broken out by AmeriSouth now became essential components, and therefore did not qualify for shorter life spans.


This case sets a new standard for the cost segregation method in depreciating assets. It makes the process harder by being more specific in its definition of what assets are deemed essential to the structure of the type of building. Although benefits for tax payers are still possible under this method, businesses must be more careful in how they break down the various categories of a building when depreciating under this method.

By Greg Dowell July 10, 2025
How the Tax Act impacts businesses
By Greg Dowell July 10, 2025
Key information for individuals
By Greg Dowell March 17, 2025
The annual list of tax scams was recently released by the IRS, see article below.
By Greg Dowell March 17, 2025
Rates remain unchanged for 2nd quarter 2025
By Greg Dowell January 24, 2025
To those of us NOT in government, we ask why did this take so long?
By Greg Dowell January 24, 2025
How much impact will Trump's executive order have on the IRS.
By Greg Dowell January 23, 2025
Improve profitability, reduce the opportunity for fraud, focus on your core business, eliminate excuses for tardy financial data - what's not to love about outsourcing your accounting?
By Greg Dowell January 17, 2025
Maybe it's an inheritance, a bonus at work, or some other cash windfall - the question is when and how is the best way to invest?
By Greg Dowell January 16, 2025
Baby, it's cold outside - let's talk financial matters and investments!
By Greg Dowell December 31, 2024
As you may be aware, you can't keep retirement funds in your account indefinitely. You generally have to start taking withdrawals from your IRA, SIMPLE IRA, SEP IRA, or 401(k) plan when you reach age 73. Roth IRAs do not require withdrawals until after the death of the owner. Your required minimum distribution (RMD) is the minimum amount you must withdraw from your account each year. You can withdraw more than the minimum required amount. Your withdrawals will be included in your taxable income except for any part that was taxed before (your basis) or that can be received tax-free (such as qualified distributions from designated Roth accounts). We typically instruct our clients to turn to their investment advisors to determine if they are required to take an RMD and to calculate the amount of the RMD for the year. Most investment advisors and plan custodians will provide those services free of charge, and will also send reminders to their clients each year to take the RMD before the deadlines. That said, it is still good to have a general understanding of the RMD rules. The RMD rules are complicated, so we have put together the following summary that we hope you will find helpful: When do I take my first RMD (the required beginning date)? For an IRA, you must take your first RMD by April 1 of the year following the year in which you turn 73, regardless of whether you're still employed. For a 401(k) plan, you must take your first RMD by April 1 of the year following the later of the year you turn 73, or the year you retire (if allowed by your plan). If you are a 5% owner, you must start RMDs by April 1 of the year following the year you turn 73. What is the deadline for taking subsequent RMDs after the first RMD? After the first RMD, you must take subsequent RMDs by December 31 of each year beginning with the calendar year containing your required beginning date. How do I calculate my RMD? The RMD for any year is the account balance as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar year divided by a distribution period from the IRS's "Uniform Lifetime Table." A separate table is used if the sole beneficiary is the owner's spouse who is ten or more years younger than the owner. How should I take my RMDs if I have multiple accounts? If you have more than one IRA, you must calculate the RMD for each IRA separately each year. However, you may aggregate your RMD amounts for all of your IRAs and withdraw the total from one IRA or a portion from each of your IRAs. You do not have to take a separate RMD from each IRA. If you have more than one 401(k) plan, you must calculate and satisfy your RMDs separately for each plan and withdraw that amount from that plan. May I withdraw more than the RMD? Yes, you can always withdraw more than the RMD, but you can't apply excess withdrawals toward future years' RMDs. May I take more than one withdrawal in a year to meet my RMD? You may withdraw your annual RMD in any number of distributions throughout the year, as long as you withdraw the total annual minimum amount by December 31 (or April 1 if it is for your first RMD). May I satisfy my RMD obligation by making qualified charitable distributions? You may satisfy your RMD obligation by having the trustee make qualified charitable distribution of up to $108,000 in 2025 ($105,000 in 2024) to a public charity (some public charities excepted). The amount of the qualified charitable distribution will not be included in your income. You may also make a one-time election to make qualified charitable distributions to certain charitable trusts or a charitable gift annuity. What happens if I don't take the RMD? If the distributions to you in any year are less than the RMD for that year, you are subject to an additional tax equal to 25% of the undistributed RMD (reduced to 10% if corrected during a specified time frame).
More Posts